Default User Avatar

NO. He is self-serving, period. He didn't save any courses - he is playing the real estate game of buying distressed properties. If the value of the land becomes greater than the cash flow of his courses, I guarantee you those courses will sprout buildings! Courses in Aberdeenshire will experience a short-time spike due to the publicity of his track but the long-term impact will be more negative than positive. The destruction of the nature area and his housing development blight will more than offset any positives (economic and otherwise) he brings. Scottish golf survived and prospered for centuries before he arrived and will do so long after he is dead and forgotten. I've played all of the links (9 holers included) in the UK and IRE but have no intention of playing his artificial blight on the land. I can't wait for the day the circle of life comes full circle - the game will be much better for it.

Default User Avatar

no

I think the Donald is a great ambassador for the game of golf. He loves the game and is passionate about it. I was not much of a fan of the man until I watched his series on The Golf Channel, where I saw a more complete picture of him. There is much good about him that the media refuses to report, they focus on controversy and scandal. He is a very fair man, who really cares for his employees, family and club members. He is demanding, but there is nothing wrong with that, we would be in much better shape as a country if more people adhered to his high standards. He is knowledgeable about the history and traditions of golf, and respectful of them. He is talented in developing quality projects. The level of attention and detail he demands from his employees is what makes his golf courses wonderful quality courses. He has saved several courses that were in decline.

The Donald is bad for anything he comes near, notwithstanding the short term "bump" described in this article. He is an enormously insecure and enormously dishonest child, whose only concern is himself.

Worthwhile, long term, sustainable, growth in our sport can only take place/ utterly requiresat least a modicum of character, something a foreign to Mr. Trump as good hair and modesty.

Does golf need Donald Trump? Yes and no. Yes, because he can put some money into a few older courses and renovate them to modern standards, etc.

No, because all he ever does is drive up the prices to play on the courses he owns and the price to play nearby courses, and the prices to play any courses that believe they are as good or better than a "Trump" course.

Golf is already too expensive for many people, Trump is just going to make it more elitist.

Members of The Point Golf Club on Lake Norman, north of Charlotte, are wrestling with this question in a more personal way -- they have to decide if The Donald is good for golf and them. He has made a $7 million bid to buy the upscale club and, as you might imagine, members are split over whether it is a good idea. On the one hand, he will almost assuredly upgrade the golf course and amenities but some members worry that they will pay significantly more for the improvements. As I wrote at my blog site, what's a few thousand more in dues if the values of their six- and seven-figure homes improve by a few percentage points because of the improved reputation of the club? (There are no reports if The Donald will insist on checking the birth certificates of members.)

Default User Avatar

He screwed all of his members at Trump Int'l in Palm Beach that paid upwards of $250,00 to join by taking in 100 new members for no initiation fee and around $22,000 in annual dues to boost cash flow so he could buy Doral. Who knows what he did at his other Clubs to boost membership. Is he good for golf long-term? Ask his creditors at his bankrupt casinos and hotels.

He loves golf and puts a lot of money on it.
I think he's definitely very good for the game, probably more than all of us who leave comments here...

The Donald is good for "developer" golf, PGA Tour golf,"trophy course" golf, and insanely expensive golf. Not so much for those who comprise the vast majority of the golfing public.If Trump wants to make a true contribution to the game I'd suggest he donate the cost of building one of his masterpieces to the First Tee program.By doing so he may even create a number of new customers.

I am personally pleased with anyone who supports golf, and Donald Trump certainly does that in a big way. He is controversial in the press, but in person he is both professional and very personable. Most big personalities have both detractors and supporters. I support Trump's efforts to promote golf. Those efforts help all golfers.