Golf Advisor Icon
Rating Index Rating
Tooltip Information Icon
1.5
2 Reviews (2)
5 Stars
0
4 Stars
0
3 Stars
0
2 Stars
1
1 Stars
1
Conditions
1.0
Value
2.0
Layout
3.5
Friendliness
4.5
Pace
3.0
Amenities
1.5
50.0%
Recommend this course
1 out of 2 reviews
Read Reviews
Average Rating
Avg Rating
0
5 Stars
0
4 Stars
0
3 Stars
0
2 Stars
0
1 Stars
0
Conditions
0
Value
0
Layout
0
Friendliness
0
Pace
0
Amenities
0
0%
Recommend this course
Read Reviews
Average Rating
Avg Rating
0
5 Stars
0
4 Stars
0
3 Stars
0
2 Stars
0
1 Stars
0
Conditions
0
Value
0
Layout
0
Friendliness
0
Pace
0
Amenities
0
0%
Recommend this course
Read Reviews

About

Holes 18
Type
Par 73
Length 5097 yards
Slope 0
Rating 0.0

Course Details

Year Built 1910

Rentals/Services

Carts Yes

Practice/Instruction

Golf School Academy Yes
Teaching Pro Yes
Pitching/Chipping Area Yes
Putting Green Yes

Policies

Metal Spikes Allowed No

Reviews

1.5
2 Reviews (2)
Advanced Filters
Overall Rating
Recommended
Handicap
Age
Type of Golfer
Gender
Played On
Skill Intermediate
Plays Once a week
1.0
First Time Playing

Worst golf experience

With respect for the administrators and members, this course was a horrible playing experience.

We paid roughly US$40 each for green fees and another US$30 each for clubs and trolley. The course was fairly empty of players and it didn't take long to discover why. The fairways were generous however badly unkept with long grass that allowed no run. If you miss the fairway, good luck finding your ball because even the first cut was ankle deep and so much of our day was spent trying to locate our ball even when fairways were hit.

Most of the greens were plagued with ant hills and not all had flags making it difficult to plan an approach from the fairway. What flags there were were about 1m tall pieces of bamboo shoved in the hole. The bunkers were atrocious in appearance but played the best of the course with excellent sand.

No on course bathrooms or water was available on the day we visited though the club staff were friendly and very helpful.

We chose Cerro as an alternative to Montevideo because of price, but at US$70 per person we were left bitterly dissapponted and should have stumped up the extra US$50 each to play at Montevideo.

Value Poor
Layout Average
Friendliness Good
Pace Poor
Amenities Poor
Played On
Handicap 10-14
Skill Intermediate
Plays Once a week
I Recommend This Course
2.0
Previously Played
Perfect weather
Walked

Challenging layout in poor conditions

I enjoy playing here. The layout is very good located on the river about 30 minutes from the old town.

The conditioning is poor. Tees are not maintained. Fairways and rough are well grassed but grass is long with weeds. Bunkers I did not bother with as sand is inconsistent with a lot of weeds and some water. Greens are very rough with weeds.

A good place to work on your swing and enjoy a tranquil afternoon at a tenth the cost of Club de Golf Montevideo.

Conditions Poor
Value Average
Layout Good
Friendliness Excellent
Pace Excellent
Amenities Fair
Difficulty Somewhat Challenging
Nearby Courses
Montevideo, Montevideo
4.5882352941
3
Ciudad de la Costa, Canelones
0.0
0

Stay & Play Offers

From $499
Valid dates: May 10, 2020 - Jun 18, 2020
Every spring getaway should include the perfect mixture of lakeside recreation and 4-Star relaxation! The Tahoe Tap-in Stay & Play package offers a luxurious stay at Edgewood Tahoe Resort plus your choice of two rounds of golf with a cart at Lake Tahoe's only public lakefront golf course, two 50-minute treatments at the serene Spa Edgewood, or one of each for each night per reservation.
Now Reading
New Cookie Policy
WE AND OUR PARTNERS USE COOKIES ON THIS SITE TO IMPROVE OUR SERVICE, PERFORM ANALYTICS, PERSONALIZE ADVERTISING, MEASURE ADVERTISING PERFORMANCE, AND REMEMBER WEBSITE PREFERENCES. BY USING THE SITE, YOU CONSENT TO THESE COOKIES. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON COOKIES INCLUDING HOW TO MANAGE YOUR CONSENT VISIT OUR COOKIE POLICY.
CONTINUE