Brookscm72

Played 9 this morning as a single. It was habitual waiting with an occasional outbreak of golf. Greens were wet (it had rained) but too long and putted slow regardless. Fairways were B-minus material, with some bare spots and 2 different grass species growing. Rough was a lot of clover mixed with sparse grass & copious amounts of bare earth. (I know, don't hit it there.) Bunkers had great sand in them, but hadn't been maintained; black plastic was visible, no grooming. I liked the bones of the course a lot. Nice tree lined fairways, elevation changes are always fun in my opinion, and well placed greens and bunkers. Too bad no one's taking care of the property or policing pace of play. I may go back again, but it's going to need to be the first tee time to avoid the wait and probably nearer the Golf Team's invitational.

Lots of trees and elevation changes make this a great course to play. Greens were in great shape (speedy! ). Fairways and tee boxes were great; the rough was spotty and dry, so errant shots kinda took off, but hey, don't aim there. Bunkers were a little neglected. Pace was just ok; somehow 2 people held up the whole front 9. I play here every year at least once, and it's always a good round; I'll put the back nine versus just about any other course. Especially pretty scenery in the fall.

Usually play here at least once a year, sometimes more. Always in good shape. Tees & fairways were in great shape. Rough was long and going to mean bogey unless you got lucky. Greens were great and quick. Bunkers were a little forgotten. We had a 2some of hacks in front of us that ended up really slowing us down, so we played front 9 twice. A great links-style course.

Played here every year, once or twice each yr. Lots of bunkers, is their trademark. Greens ruled true, fairs/rough all pretty good. Some of those Bunkers could use a little treatment! (I know...don't hit in them)