davjak001

First of all - the staff was very nice the entire time.

Two very different nines, front nine appears to have been there quite a while. Narrow, small greens, pretty poor design, funky doglegs, overall fair to poor condition. 8 short holes and one very long par five ninth. Would rate one star.

No 10 is a par three over water, pretty much in line with the other holes in the front. Then on No 11, someone is developing new housing and has built new holes for No 11 thru 17. Those holes are overall good, much more modern and in much better condition than the front. Then back to No 18 that is part of the old course. Kind of a funky mismatch of holes overall.

Just went there because we were driving by and it fit our schedule. Would hope there are much better choices nearby.

Played on a Wednesday early afternoon, not many folks there so pace of play great. Lots of doglegs, some challenging holes, especially the stretch of longer holes 10-14. So-so conditions, could use some weed killer. Plays a little longer than scorecard with stronger holes uphill.
Overall decent, pretty challenging course from back tees. Reasonable value at $27.

Staff said new management in last 2 months is working hard to improve conditions. Fairways need to grow in some, tough but interesting layout, misses are penalizied most times. Play somewhat slow, needs marshall to keep overmatched players moving along. Worth checking back on in summer to see if improvements continued.