ryandietz

I will say, the greens are in decent shape, but the rest of the course is really rough in most spots. The fairways have dead spots all over. The pace of play is miserable, especially when you know the culprit. They need a ranger badly. The layout is fun, but you wait longer than you play. Tough to say $49 is a fair value.

I've been playing at Chick for more than 10 years and it's always hit or miss. This time it was a miss. We went out at 6am so pace was good, but the course is in terrible shape. Greens are okay but tees are shot and there are many grass less sections. It's like they kind of let it go other than the greens. The course could be really good if they would pump some money into it. I guess you get what you pay for, but I would gladly pay more to play a nicer course.

This course requires you to be fairly accurate on a lot of holes. There isn't much variation in the design. Water on the right on 14 holes. Don't slice. I'm not a big fan of target golf because it doesn't allow for as much creativity I think. "5 wood, 7 iron, wedge. blegh." They do a good job of spacing people out though so we played in about 4 hours. Course was in average shape. Nobody who plays here repairs divots though.